Projects STRLCPY scorecard Files
🤬
89 lines | UTF-8 | 4 KB

Requirements for a check

If you'd like to add a check, make sure it meets the following criteria and then create a new GitHub Issue to discuss with the team:

  • The scorecard must only be composed of automate-able, objective data. For example, a project having 10 contributors doesn’t necessarily mean it’s more secure than a project with 50 contributors. But, having two maintainers might be preferable to only having one - the larger bus factor and ability to provide code reviews is objectively better.
  • The scorecard criteria can be as specific as possible and are not limited to general recommendations. For example, for Go, we can recommend/require specific linters and analyzers to be run on the codebase.
  • The scorecard can be populated for any open source project without any work or interaction from maintainers.
  • Maintainers must be provided with a mechanism to correct any automated scorecard findings they feel were made in error, provide "hints" for anything we can't detect automatically, and even dispute the applicability of a given scorecard finding for that repository.
  • Any criteria in the scorecard must be actionable. It should be possible, with help, for any project to "check all the boxes".
  • Any solution to compile a scorecard should be usable by the greater open source community to monitor upstream security.

How to write a check

The steps to writing a check are as follows:

  1. Create a file under the checks/ folder, say checks/mycheck.go

  2. Give the check a name and register the check:

    // Note: export the name by starting it with an upper-case letter.
    const CheckMyCheckName string = "My-Check"
    
    func init() {
        registerCheck(CheckMyCheckName, EntryPointMyCheck)
    }
    
  3. Log useful information with checker.DetailLogger:

    • Use checker.DetailLogger.Warn() to provide detail on low-score results. This is shown when the user supplies the show-results option.
    • Use checker.DetailLogger.Info() to provide detail on high-score results. This is shown when the user supplies the show-results option.
    • Use checker.DetailLogger.Debug() to provide detail in verbose mode: this is shown only when the user supplies the --verbosity Debug option.
    • If your message relates to a file, try to provide information such as the Path, line number Offset and Snippet.
  4. If the check fails in a way that is irrecoverable, return a result with the checker.CreateRuntimeErrorResult() function. For example, if an error is returned from an API you call, use this function.

  5. Create the result of the check as follows:

    • Always provide a high-level sentence explaining the check's result/score.
    • If the check runs properly but is unable to determine a score, use checker.CreateInconclusiveResult().
    • For proportional results, use checker.CreateProportionalScoreResult().
    • For maximum and minimum scores, use checker.CreateMaxScoreResult() and checker.CreateMinScoreResult(), respectively.
    • If you need more flexibility and need to set a specific score, use checker.CreateResultWithScore() with one of the constants declared, such as checker.HalfResultScore.
  6. Dealing with errors: see errors/errors.md.

  7. Create unit tests for low, high and inconclusive scores. Put them in a file checks/mycheck_test.go.

  8. Create e2e tests in e2e/mycheck_test.go. Use a dedicated repo that will not change over time, so that it's reliable for the tests.

  9. Update the checks/checks.yaml with a description of your check.

  10. Generate docs/check.md using make generate-docs. This will validate and generate docs/check.md.

  11. Update the README.md with a short description of your check.

For actual examples, look at checks/binary_artifact.go, checks/code_review.go and checks/pinned_dependencies.go.

Please wait...
Page is in error, reload to recover